I
was in the process of preparing an update on Mobile Embrace when they dropped a
bomb that slashed 42% off the market cap in one afternoon.
Some
of the update I prepared involved trying to assess what the FY17 results might
be. Given my goals for this website are for complete honesty and disclosure I will
provide the numbers I had calculated. I was anticipating revenue of around $80m
with NPAT of approximately $7m (1.8cps). At the share price on November 16 of
25c I was indicating this was good value (a forward P/E of 14 among other
things).
Given
my purchase price of 30c for the example portfolio the downgrade (that I will
go into below) is obviously disappointing. Had my new analysis been available I
would not be a buyer at 30c. The valuation would be too stretched for my liking
given the risks.
However,
that is history and all we can do is assess the situation in front of us. We
are talking about a share price of 14.5c and updated information. The investment
proposition as it stands is now completely different to yesterday.
There
are two things I would like to reiterate before carrying on.
1.
Trust
in management is a very important part of investing. MBE management have
performed well to date in my opinion. I have no specific reason to believe this
is the first in a string of negative updates, but there are countless examples
of this elsewhere in the share market. In this case I give management the
benefit of the doubt. However, I will be watching very closely at what plays
out over the next few months.
2.
A
growth company should never be judged on a single set of financial results. As stated
above, it is possible that this is the first in a string of negative updates. We
cannot judge this yet. In the future we will be able to look back and see
whether this is a blip on the growth radar or the beginning of the end. As
stated above, management gets the benefit of the doubt this time.
MBE
have guided the following:
H1FY17
Revenue
>$28m
EBITDA
>$2m
FY17
Revenue
>$70m
EBITDA
>$8m
Their
commentary around the lower than expected first half revenue discussed
compliance changes relating to Australian DCB impacting their processes. This had
a negative effect on customer acquisition and impacted their marketing spend. To
be honest, I was unimpressed with how they explained it. Their release was
confusing and didn’t entirely make sense. However, they are on record saying it
is a one-off issue. They appear to be well on the way to a return to business
as usual.
The
marketing channel has been experiencing good growth over last year. Marketing accounted
for almost 50% of revenue in FY16. It is obviously a very important part of the
business in its own right, but the DCB hiccup highlights the importance of diverse
revenue streams. I am assuming 30% growth from the marketing operations for
FY17.
My
financial estimates following managements guidance:
Revenue
- $72m (up 20%)
EBITDA
– $8.5m (down 10%)
NPBT
– $5.2m (down 25%)
NPAT
- $3.9m (down 20%)
EPS
– 1.0cps (down 20%)
The
expenses and marketing costs given the expansion are difficult to estimate. I have
estimated a modest increase to most expenses, hence a negative impact of the
profit figures. The company has guided >$8m EBITDA, so my profit figures may
be a little bit on the low side. I am happy with that given the circumstances.
Management
would most likely have budgeted for slightly more revenue growth and therefore over
allocated marketing budget. Hence the
lower profit for FY17 even though revenue will increase.
I
would normally look more closely at operating cash-flow. Given the above this
is very difficult to estimate. FY16 had OCF of $6.3m. I am assuming something
around $5m this year as a ballpark estimate. The key point is that it is likely
to remain well in the positives.
At
the current share price of 14.5c the forward P/E ratio using my estimates is
around 15. For a growth company with positive OCF, money in the bank and negligible
debt that is very attractive. International DCB is trending very well and the
marketing business is growing. It is only the (significant) Australian DCB
business that has suffered a setback. If international DCB is successful then
today’s announcement is simply not important going forward.
The
critical investment decision is whether the issue is a one-off or a sign of
things to come. I am currently satisfied that, given the valuation, other
revenue streams and management’s track record, the investment proposition
offered at 14.5c is a good one. I purchased more today at 14c.
thanks for the analysis.
ReplyDeleteI did a similar p/l forecast, my international DCB estimate is pretty similar to yours, at 12.45m. However if we assume a 20%-30% increase in m-marketing revenue, this then leaves only about 25m revenue for DCB Australia -- a 13% decrease from last year. Alternatively, if DCB Australia remains the same, then we shall see no improvement in m-marketing.
The forecast revenue is capped at 70m, there is no way to see both increase in M-marketing and DCB Australia. which senario you recon is more likely the case?
Thanks again for sharing of opinions!
liangzile
My numbers allow for a reduction in Aussie DCB revenue. That is the only part of the business effected by the recent news. It might take the rest of the financial year to understand how much of an effect this compliance issue has had, so it is important to expect a reduction in this segment in any forecasts. All others appear to be on a good growth trajectory.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete